Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link

Optimized PostCandidate::get_screen_names to avoid redundant string clones.

Original code cloned self.author_screen_name (Option) before checking if it was Some. It also cloned self.retweeted_screen_name before checking if retweeted_user_id was present.

The optimization:

  1. Matches on &self.author_screen_name to avoid creating a temporary Option<String>.
  2. Matches on (&self.retweeted_screen_name, self.retweeted_user_id) to verify both exist before cloning the string.

This prevents unnecessary heap allocation for the string when retweeted_user_id is missing (a case where the string would be cloned and immediately dropped).

Benchmarks show ~22% improvement in the partial missing case and ~16% improvement in the full hit case.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 8531740062697497091 started by @sashimikun

Refactor `get_screen_names` in `home-mixer/candidate_pipeline/candidate.rs` to avoid cloning `Option<String>` and unnecessary string allocations when validation fails.

Benchmark results (Retweet missing case):
Original: ~98 ns
Optimized: ~94 ns (~4% faster)

Benchmark results (Retweet valid case, but user_id missing):
Original: ~120 ns
Optimized: ~93 ns (~22% faster)

Benchmark results (All present):
Original: ~174 ns
Optimized: ~145 ns (~16% faster)

This optimization changes "clone-then-check" to "check-then-clone", saving allocation in cases where related data (e.g. user_id) is missing, and avoiding intermediate Option clones.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant