Add gene annotations to anndata vars

[emdann]

Closes #14

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.47368% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 92.72%. Comparing base (2398977) to head (e669b8b).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/genomic_features/annotate.py	89.18%	4 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #23      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   93.69%   92.72%   -0.98%     
==========================================
  Files           6        7       +1     
  Lines         333      371      +38     
==========================================
+ Hits          312      344      +32     
- Misses         21       27       +6     

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/genomic_features/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/genomic_features/annotate.py	89.18% <89.18%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[emdann]

Outstanding issues:

• Dealing with common column names between var table and annotation table. Throw error?

[lauradmartens]

I found the variable names a bit confusing because in pandas syntax on means that the column is present in both tables. Maybe we could name it left_on and right_on like in pd.merge

[emdann]

I've changed to annotation_on and var_on to match the other params

[lauradmartens]

Looks good! I added a few minor comments :)

[ivirshup]

Yep, looks good.

One comment on the tutorial, can we make it so the AnnData used the same ensembl version as we annotate with? Either by using a different ensembl version, or a different AnnData.

[emdann]

@ivirshup wrt Ensembl version matching, the pbmc3k data was mapped with cellranger 1.1, but I am having a hard time matching this version to a Ensembl release.

I'm gonna use the data from scvi.data.heart_cell_atlas_subsampled which is mapped to cellranger 3.0.1 with hg38 which according to the old release notes corresponds to Ensembl release 93.