build(deps): bump ruff from 0.15.20 to 0.16.3 - #94
Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Bumps [ruff](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff) from 0.15.20 to 0.16.3. - [Release notes](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](astral-sh/ruff@0.15.20...0.16.3) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: ruff dependency-version: 0.16.3 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
Up to standards ✅🟢 Issues
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
Codacy results are up to standards with no new quality issues. However, the PR includes undocumented updates to dependencies other than Ruff (specifically numpy and pycares) within the lock files. While no functional logic errors were identified, the PR description lacks explicit criteria for verifying the impact of the updated linter version on the codebase.
About this PR
- The PR includes concurrent updates to numpy and pycares in the lock files which are not mentioned in the PR title or description.
Test suggestions
- Execute the ruff check command using the updated version on the codebase to ensure no new linting errors or regressions are introduced.
- Verify that the updated requirements-ci.txt and requirements-codacy.txt files can be installed successfully in a clean environment.
Prompt proposal for missing tests
Consider implementing these tests if applicable:
1. Execute the ruff check command using the updated version on the codebase to ensure no new linting errors or regressions are introduced.
2. Verify that the updated requirements-ci.txt and requirements-codacy.txt files can be installed successfully in a clean environment.
Low confidence findings
- The PR description is missing explicit acceptance criteria or verification steps to ensure the linter update does not introduce unexpected regressions or new linting errors across the codebase.
TIP Improve review quality by adding custom instructions
TIP How was this review? Give us feedback
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Bumps ruff from 0.15.20 to 0.16.3.
Release notes
Sourced from ruff's releases.
... (truncated)
Changelog
Sourced from ruff's changelog.
... (truncated)
Commits
b0e4702Bump 0.16.3 (#27723)ecdd401[ty] Separate script and uv modules from project metadata (#27720)1263524[ty] Simplify display implementations with std::fmt::from_fn (#27718)59196ba[ty] Unify polarity-aware relation construction (#27707)b8c5e73[ty] Disable CodSpeed cycle estimation for instrumented benchmarks (#27706)2b0d210[ty] Centralize matched argument relations (#27705)a9130f3[pyupgrade] Add rule to replacewhile 1withwhile True(while-one, `...c64c7d6[ty] Model try exception flow with operation checkpoints (#27471)9dea5ef[ty] Avoid deriving sequents for typevars with concrete bounds (#27587)9798e88[ty] Preserve enum exhaustiveness with custom missing methods (#27700)Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting
@dependabot rebase.Dependabot commands and options
You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:
@dependabot rebasewill rebase this PR@dependabot recreatewill recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it@dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditionswill show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency@dependabot ignore this major versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this minor versionwill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)@dependabot ignore this dependencywill close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)