Skip to content

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Fix information leakage in authentication exceptions - #183

Open
shadowcoder8 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/fix-exception-leakage-1379834590047110492
Open

πŸ›‘οΈ Sentinel: [MEDIUM] Fix information leakage in authentication exceptions#183
shadowcoder8 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sentinel/fix-exception-leakage-1379834590047110492

Conversation

@shadowcoder8

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🚨 Severity: MEDIUM
πŸ’‘ Vulnerability: Unhandled exceptions in the admin_login route were caught by a broad except Exception as e: block and directly returned to the client as an HTTPException with the string representation of the error. This risks exposing sensitive internal details such as database connection strings, paths, or stack traces if an unexpected failure occurs.
🎯 Impact: Potential information disclosure which attackers can use to gather context for further attacks.
πŸ”§ Fix: Refactored the try...except block to first catch and explicitly re-raise expected HTTPExceptions. The general Exception handler now logs the detailed error internally and returns a generic "An internal error occurred during login" message (status 500) to the client.
βœ… Verification: Added an ad-hoc test script tests/verify_auth.py that mocks an internal exception to verify the generic 500 error is returned and specific HTTP exceptions are still properly propagated. Run the full standard test suite to confirm no regressions. All pass. Also added learnings to .jules/sentinel.md.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 1379834590047110492 started by @shadowcoder8

Explicitly catch and re-raise HTTPExceptions while general
Exceptions are now logged and a generic 500 status error
is returned to the client to prevent sensitive data disclosure.

Co-authored-by: shadowcoder8 <185462083+shadowcoder8@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

πŸ‘‹ Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a πŸ‘€ emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant