Skip to content

docs: Update ROADMAP with accurate status and reorganized priorities#171

Merged
shaia merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update-roadmap
Mar 6, 2026
Merged

docs: Update ROADMAP with accurate status and reorganized priorities#171
shaia merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
update-roadmap

Conversation

@shaia
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@shaia shaia commented Mar 6, 2026

Clean up backend coverage table (remove misleading footnotes), reorganize phases to reflect current project state, and update completion markers for recently finished work.

Clean up backend coverage table (remove misleading footnotes),
reorganize phases to reflect current project state, and update
completion markers for recently finished work.
@shaia shaia requested a review from Copilot March 6, 2026 07:22
@shaia shaia self-assigned this Mar 6, 2026
@shaia shaia merged commit 9782679 into master Mar 6, 2026
17 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Updates ROADMAP.md to reflect current project status by cleaning up backend coverage notes, reorganizing/condensing roadmap sections, and updating completion markers for recently finished work.

Changes:

  • Simplifies the backend coverage table (removes footnotes, adds a Boundary Conditions row, adjusts completion markers).
  • Reorganizes/condenses “Known Issues” and multiple Phase subsections (marking some items as resolved/completed).
  • Refreshes milestones and priorities, including 3D support and validation status summaries.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

You can also share your feedback on Copilot code review. Take the survey.

Comment thread ROADMAP.md
- [x] 3D support complete (all phases), see Phase 3.1
- [x] Symmetry planes now supported
- [ ] Only structured grids
- [ ] No 3D validation benchmarks yet
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The "What's Missing" item "No 3D validation benchmarks yet" looks inaccurate: the repo already has 3D validation tests (e.g., tests/validation/test_taylor_green_3d.c, tests/validation/test_quiescent_3d.c, and 3D Poisson manufactured-solution tests in tests/math/test_poisson_3d.c). Consider removing this bullet or rewording it to reflect the actual remaining 3D validation gaps (e.g., missing 3D Poiseuille / cavity benchmarks, larger-grid performance validation, etc.).

Suggested change
- [ ] No 3D validation benchmarks yet
- [ ] Additional 3D validation benchmarks (e.g., Poiseuille / cavity flows, larger-grid performance and accuracy studies)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Comment thread ROADMAP.md
Comment on lines 686 to 687
- [ ] Phase 5-7: SIMD, OMP, CUDA backends for 3D
- [ ] Phase 8: 3D VTK output, examples, validation (Taylor-Green 3D, Poiseuille 3D)
Copy link

Copilot AI Mar 6, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The v0.2.0 milestone section marks 3D Phases 5–8 as incomplete, but earlier in this document "Phase 3.1 3D Support" is marked complete and explicitly states SIMD/OMP/CUDA/I/O/examples/docs are done. These two sections conflict; please reconcile them (either adjust the Phase 3.1 status/details or update the v0.2.0 milestone checklist to match the current implementation state).

Suggested change
- [ ] Phase 5-7: SIMD, OMP, CUDA backends for 3D
- [ ] Phase 8: 3D VTK output, examples, validation (Taylor-Green 3D, Poiseuille 3D)
- [x] Phases 5–7: SIMD, OMP, CUDA backends for 3D
- [x] Phase 8: 3D VTK output, examples, validation (Taylor-Green 3D, Poiseuille 3D)

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants