merge queue: checking epbs (01f19c4) and #1215 together

[mergify]

🎉 This pull request has been checked successfully and will be merged soon. 🎉

Branch epbs (01f19c4) and #1215 are queued together for merge.

This pull request has been created by Mergify to check the mergeability of #1215.
You don't need to do anything. Mergify will close this pull request automatically when it is complete.

Required conditions of queue rule default for merge:

• check-success=cli-reference-check
• check-success=run-local-testnet
• check-success=test-suite-success

Required conditions to stay in the queue:

• #approved-reviews-by >= 1
  • chore(deps): bump Lighthouse to unstable HEAD e58ec88fe and migrate sign_attestations to SingleAttestation #1215
• check-success=license/cla
  • chore(deps): bump Lighthouse to unstable HEAD e58ec88fe and migrate sign_attestations to SingleAttestation #1215
• check-success=target-branch-check
  • chore(deps): bump Lighthouse to unstable HEAD e58ec88fe and migrate sign_attestations to SingleAttestation #1215
• label!=do-not-merge
  • chore(deps): bump Lighthouse to unstable HEAD e58ec88fe and migrate sign_attestations to SingleAttestation #1215

---
checking_base_sha: 01f19c49c20ec515a25d27084699b0885d68b377
previous_check_retries: []
previous_failed_batches: []
pull_requests:
  - number: 1215
    scopes: []
scopes: []
...

[github-actions]

Your PR title doesn't follow the Conventional Commit guidelines.

Example of valid titles:

• feat: add new user login
• fix: correct button size
• docs: update README

Usage:

• feat: Introduces a new feature
• fix: Patches a bug
• chore: General maintenance tasks or updates
• test: Adding new tests or modifying existing tests
• perf: Performance improvements
• refactor: Changes to improve code structure
• docs: Documentation updates
• ci: Changes to CI/CD configurations
• revert: Reverts a previously merged PR

Breaking Changes

Breaking changes are noted by using an exclamation mark. For example:

• feat!: changed the API
• chore(node)!: Removed unused public function

Help

For more information, follow the guidelines here: https://www.conventionalcommits.org/en/v1.0.0/

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 94.59016% with 33 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 70.11%. Comparing base (01f19c4) to head (4cd09e5).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
anchor/common/ssv_types/src/consensus.rs	95.55%	14 Missing ⚠️
anchor/validator_store/src/lib.rs	77.19%	13 Missing ⚠️
...tore/src/testing/committee_attestation_slashing.rs	97.85%	3 Missing ⚠️
anchor/network/src/peer_manager/discovery.rs	0.00%	2 Missing ⚠️
anchor/spec_tests/src/utils/error_codes.rs	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             epbs    #1225      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.67%   70.11%   +0.44%     
==========================================
  Files         165      166       +1     
  Lines       32475    32959     +484     
==========================================
+ Hits        22626    23109     +483     
- Misses       9849     9850       +1     

Flag	Coverage Δ
rust	70.11% <94.59%> (+0.44%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.