feat: Conventional commit linter for standardised commits/PRs

[IchordeDionysos]

Rules:

• Follows conventional commits (with allowed change types)
• Uses uppercase in subject
• Puts Jira issues in brackets

Ensure that commits follow the format:

feat: Update dependencies (SC-123)
feat(packageA): Update dependencies (SC-123)
feat: Update dependencies

And block the following PR/commit names:

Update dependencies
feat: SC-123 Update dependencies
feat: update dependencies (SC-123)
feat: Update dependencies SC-123
feat: SC-123-update-dependencies
feat: update-dependencies

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch D/conventional-commit-lint-workflow

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[IchordeDionysos]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.

[richard-webb-dev]

i'd be happy with this. You should get more reviews though
i think it could be a bit more lenient too - capitalized first letter!?

If you can find a way to give warnings instead of errors on missing tickets, or a way to implement per repo, you'll be able to merge this much quicker

[IchordeDionysos]

It doesn't error on missing tickets :)