Update test regress vals for chandra_aca coord improvements

[jeanconn]

Description

Update test regress vals for chandra_aca coord changes due to sot/chandra_aca#202.

It isn't immediately expected to me that one of the roll option intervals went away on one of the tests, but it is perfectly plausible that with small coordinate changes enough of the scenario can change to have an impact.

Requires

sot/chandra_aca#202
also tested with sot/proseco#414

Interface impacts

Testing

Unit tests

• Mac

(ska3-latest) flame:sparkles jean$ git rev-parse HEAD
1828101ff1d57ad487974162eb2da9154749be83
(ska3-latest) flame:sparkles jean$ env PYTHONPATH=/Users/jean/git/chandra_aca:/Users/jean/git/proseco pytest --pdb
========================================================================================= test session starts ==========================================================================================
platform darwin -- Python 3.13.11, pytest-9.0.2, pluggy-1.6.0
rootdir: /Users/jean/git
configfile: pytest.ini
plugins: anyio-4.12.1, timeout-2.4.0
collected 128 items                                                                                                                                                                                    

sparkles/tests/test_checks.py ..................................................................................................                                                                 [ 76%]
sparkles/tests/test_find_er_catalog.py .....                                                                                                                                                     [ 80%]
sparkles/tests/test_review.py .....................                                                                                                                                              [ 96%]
sparkles/tests/test_yoshi.py ....                                                                                                                                                                [100%]

========================================================================================= 128 passed in 39.27s

Independent check of unit tests by [REVIEWER NAME]

• [PLATFORM]:

Functional tests

No functional testing.

[jeanconn]

@taldcroft what do you think? Do I need to inspect and justify these updates more? For example the small changes in P2 I can hand-wave past saying that marginalized probabilities can be changed by the different calculation of the position on the CCD, but I don't know if we need to confirm which component of the probably changed for each test.

[taldcroft]

Looks fine. It is never ideal to see a discrete change like in the roll intervals, but we accept that these things are little finicky and have hard boundaries that can (and do) get crossed with small changes in inputs.