Skip to content

About

☁️ A comparative overview of managed cloud services across the primary public cloud markets. ☁️ Totally inspired by https://comparecloud.in/

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Repository files navigation

Compare Cloud

An open, up-to-date mapping of equivalent managed services across AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud — plus a second table comparing the data platforms Databricks, Microsoft Fabric, and Snowflake.

Live site: https://soyomarvaldezg.github.io/compare-cloud/

Compare Cloud — AWS vs Azure vs Google Cloud

Why

The classic reference for this, CloudComparer, stopped being maintained around 2023: service names went stale (Azure Active Directory instead of Microsoft Entra ID), documentation URLs rotted, and retired services lingered. This project keeps the idea alive with a design built for freshness:

  • Data and presentation are separated. The mapping lives in small YAML files — updating a service name is a one-line diff.
  • Every row carries a verified date, shown on the site. Staleness is visible, not hidden.
  • A monthly detector checks every link, follows redirects (which reveal renames), and opens an issue listing exactly which rows need attention.
  • The build fails if any row is older than 180 days without re-verification, so the site cannot silently rot.

Repository layout

data/services/*.yaml      cloud mapping (AWS / Azure / GCP) — one file per category (the source of truth)
data/platforms/*.yaml     data platform mapping (Databricks / Fabric / Snowflake), same format
scripts/build.py          validates the YAML and renders the static site into site/
scripts/check_links.py    staleness detector: checks every URL, reports redirects/breakage
scripts/convert_cloudcomparer.py  one-time seed from CloudComparer (MIT), kept for provenance
.github/workflows/        Pages deploy + monthly staleness check

Data format

category: Compute
services:
  - id: virtual-server
    name: Virtual machines
    verified: 2026-09-21
    aws:
      name: Amazon EC2
      url: https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/
    azure:
      name: Azure Virtual Machines
      url: https://learn.microsoft.com/azure/virtual-machines/
    gcp:
      name: Compute Engine
      url: https://cloud.google.com/compute/

Files under data/platforms/ use the same format with databricks, fabric and snowflake keys instead of aws, azure and gcp. Sections and their providers are declared in SECTIONS at the top of scripts/build.py — adding a new comparison table is one entry there plus a data directory.

Rules enforced by the build: unique id per service, ISO verified date, at least one provider, only the providers of that section, https:// URLs.

How to contribute a correction

  1. Find the service in data/services/<category>.yaml (or data/platforms/<category>.yaml).
  2. Edit the name/URL and bump verified to today.
  3. Open a pull request — that's it. CI re-validates and redeploys.

Commands

uv sync                                   # install dependencies (PyYAML)
uv run python scripts/build.py            # build the site into site/
uv run python scripts/build.py --strict   # also fail on stale rows (>180 days)
uv run python scripts/check_links.py      # check every URL (see --help for options)

Staying current

A scheduled workflow runs on the 1st of every month:

  1. check_links.py requests every service URL with a polite user agent.
  2. 404s and redirect chains are classified and reported (a redirect to a renamed product page is the strongest rename signal — e.g. the old Azure AD docs redirect to learn.microsoft.com/en-us/entra/…).
  3. The report is posted to a GitHub issue, so maintenance is a short list of one-line fixes rather than an audit.

What stays human: confirming that the suggested replacement is the right mapping. Everything up to that suggestion is mechanical.

Provenance and license

  • AI-assisted development: this project was built with AI assistance. Every data change was reviewed and verified against vendor sources before shipping; the automated link checker (above) is the ongoing guardrail. Data corrections are human-judgment calls, recorded as one-line diffs.
  • Initial dataset seeded from ilyas-it83/CloudComparer (MIT, © Ilyas F), pruned to AWS/Azure/GCP, with renames applied and retired documentation domains rewritten. Thanks to the original author.
  • Cross-checked against official vendor references: Google's AWS/Azure → Google Cloud comparison and Microsoft's AWS to Azure services comparison.
  • Product names and links point to vendor pages; trademarks belong to their owners.
  • This repository is MIT licensed (see LICENSE).

About

☁️ A comparative overview of managed cloud services across the primary public cloud markets. ☁️ Totally inspired by https://comparecloud.in/

Resources

Stars

3 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages