More realistic tau_m for the Crazyflie - #35
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
when experimenting with RAPTOR in RotorPy I noticed some weird behavior that looks like integrator overshooting. This looks plausible because
tau_m=0.005(for the Crazyflie), while the simulation frequency seems to be 100 Hz in most examples. I think the best fix is to give the Crazyflie a more realistictau_m=0.072. The value is based on our results in Data-Driven System Identification of Quadrotors Subject to Motor Delays and also plausible when checking Bitcraze's plots.Best regards!
Jonas