Skip to content

Conversation

@mulkieran
Copy link
Member

@mulkieran mulkieran commented Dec 12, 2025

Closes #546

We should focus on using sd to replace values in the workflow
configurations.

The value added by the scripts is now just knowledge of the keys. That
information is easily extracted from the workflow files themselves, if
we forget.

This way, we do not have to extend the script to also update Python
versions in the configuration, we will just add similarly formatted keys
and use sd for that, also.

Signed-off-by: mulhern <amulhern@redhat.com>
@mulkieran mulkieran self-assigned this Dec 12, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran moved this to In Review in 2025December Dec 12, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran merged commit b67e200 into stratis-storage:master Dec 12, 2025
6 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Review to Done in 2025December Dec 12, 2025
@mulkieran mulkieran deleted the issue_ci_546 branch December 12, 2025 21:02
@mulkieran mulkieran moved this from Done to Done(1) in 2025December Dec 16, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

No open projects
Status: Done(1)

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Drop update_workflow_config.py

1 participant