-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 194
channels_sv2::server::share_accounting keeps track of rejected shares
#2149
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Draft
plebhash
wants to merge
1
commit into
stratum-mining:main
Choose a base branch
from
plebhash:2026-05-08-refine-server-share-accounting
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Some generated files are not rendered by default. Learn more about how customized files appear on GitHub.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -410,6 +410,11 @@ where | |
| &self.share_accounting | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Updates rejected-share accounting for an emitted `SubmitShares.Error`. | ||
| pub fn increment_rejected_shares(&mut self, error_code: &str) { | ||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Shouldn't this be called internally by |
||
| self.share_accounting.increment_rejected_shares(error_code); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| /// Updates the channel state with a new job. | ||
| /// | ||
| /// If the template is a future template, the chain tip is not used. | ||
|
|
||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't this be called internally by
validate_share(), in case of an error?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah I think this would be a more concise approach, since we would avoid the need for the app layer to explicitly call this
(or more importantly, we would eliminate the possibility of the app layer forgetting to call this while it should)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but while trying to implement this approach, I actually started to think that it might make sense to tackle #2142 first
that way,
validate_sharecould returnShareValidationErrorvariants that already carry the needederror_codeembedded into itselfthe app layer would then be able to use those
error_codewithout having to think too much about itUh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
btw I don't think we need to wait for stratum-mining/sv2-spec#194 before we tackle #2142
as is, SRI is already diverging from the spec sentence discussed in stratum-mining/sv2-spec#165, so the doing #2142 will not change anything with regards to that
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
reverting this to draft while I work on #2142