Skip to content

Conversation

@stuebingerb
Copy link
Owner

Remove coroutineContext from execution context and use one with the provided dispatcher.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 17, 2026

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.54839% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 83.66%. Comparing base (4d69cb5) to head (fb92944).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...raphql/schema/execution/ParallelRequestExecutor.kt 93.33% 0 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #500   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   83.66%   83.66%           
=======================================
  Files         152      152           
  Lines        4904     4905    +1     
  Branches      854      854           
=======================================
+ Hits         4103     4104    +1     
  Misses        499      499           
  Partials      302      302           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 17, 2026

🐰 Bencher Report

Branchrefactor/better-coroutine-scope
Testbedubuntu-latest

🚨 1 Alert

BenchmarkMeasure
Units
ViewBenchmark Result
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
(Limit %)
com.apurebase.kgraphql.RequestCachingBenchmark.invalidRequestThroughput
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
📈 plot
🚷 threshold
🚨 alert (🔔)
33.59 ops/s x 1e3
(-83.88%)Baseline: 208.38 ops/s x 1e3
55.18 ops/s x 1e3
(164.27%)

Click to view all benchmark results
BenchmarkLatencyBenchmark Result
milliseconds (ms)
(Result Δ%)
Upper Boundary
milliseconds (ms)
(Limit %)
ThroughputBenchmark Result
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
(Result Δ%)
Lower Boundary
operations / second (ops/s) x 1e3
(Limit %)
com.apurebase.kgraphql.FunctionExecutionBenchmark.benchmarkFunctionExecution📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
6,088.69 ops/s x 1e3
(+0.79%)Baseline: 6,041.11 ops/s x 1e3
5,825.30 ops/s x 1e3
(95.67%)
com.apurebase.kgraphql.ParallelExecutionBenchmark.queryBenchmark📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
769.19 ms
(-0.18%)Baseline: 770.60 ms
772.13 ms
(99.62%)
com.apurebase.kgraphql.RequestCachingBenchmark.invalidRequest📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
🚨 view alert (🔔)
33.59 ops/s x 1e3
(-83.88%)Baseline: 208.38 ops/s x 1e3
55.18 ops/s x 1e3
(164.27%)

com.apurebase.kgraphql.RequestCachingBenchmark.largeRequest📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
8.18 ops/s x 1e3
(-2.82%)Baseline: 8.42 ops/s x 1e3
7.48 ops/s x 1e3
(91.45%)
com.apurebase.kgraphql.RequestCachingBenchmark.smallRequest📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
12.54 ops/s x 1e3
(-0.78%)Baseline: 12.64 ops/s x 1e3
11.42 ops/s x 1e3
(91.03%)
com.apurebase.kgraphql.SimpleExecutionOverheadBenchmark.benchmark📈 view plot
🚷 view threshold
458.60 ops/s x 1e3
(-2.24%)Baseline: 469.12 ops/s x 1e3
452.52 ops/s x 1e3
(98.67%)
🐰 View full continuous benchmarking report in Bencher

Base automatically changed from refactor/minor-enhancements to main January 19, 2026 09:28
Remove coroutineContext from execution context and use one with the
provided dispatcher.
@stuebingerb stuebingerb force-pushed the refactor/better-coroutine-scope branch from f44e1ee to fb92944 Compare January 19, 2026 10:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants