You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Lodash versions 4.0.0 through 4.17.22 are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. An attacker can pass crafted paths which cause Lodash to delete methods from global prototypes.
The issue permits deletion of properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.
Lodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the _.unset and _.omit functions. The fix for CVE-2025-13465 only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such as Object.prototype, Number.prototype, and String.prototype.
The issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.
The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the variable option in _.template but did not apply the same validation to options.imports key names. Both paths flow into the same Function() constructor sink.
When an application passes untrusted input as options.imports key names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.
Additionally, _.template uses assignInWith to merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties via for..in. If Object.prototype has been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed to Function().
Patches
Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0.
The fix applies two changes:
Validate importsKeys against the existing reForbiddenIdentifierChars regex (same check already used for the variable option)
Replace assignInWith with assignWith when merging imports, so only own properties are enumerated
Workarounds
Do not pass untrusted input as key names in options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.
Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert
above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential
risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're
unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket
team for help at support@socket.dev.
Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.
Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only
in this pull request, reply with the comment
@SocketSecurity ignore npm/js-beautify@1.15.1. You can
also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all.
To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to
change the triage state of this alert.
Warn
Obfuscated code: npm safer-buffer is 94.0% likely obfuscated
Next steps: Take a moment to review the security alert
above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential
risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're
unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket
team for help at support@socket.dev.
Suggestion: Packages should not obfuscate their code. Consider not using packages with obfuscated code.
Mark the package as acceptable risk. To ignore this alert only
in this pull request, reply with the comment
@SocketSecurity ignore npm/safer-buffer@2.1.2. You can
also ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all.
To ignore an alert for all future pull requests, use Socket's Dashboard to
change the triage state of this alert.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR contains the following updates:
4.17.21→4.18.1Lodash has Prototype Pollution Vulnerability in
_.unsetand_.omitfunctionsCVE-2025-13465 / GHSA-xxjr-mmjv-4gpg
More information
Details
Impact
Lodash versions 4.0.0 through 4.17.22 are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the
_.unsetand_.omitfunctions. An attacker can pass crafted paths which cause Lodash to delete methods from global prototypes.The issue permits deletion of properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.
Patches
This issue is patched on 4.17.23.
Severity
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:PReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
lodash vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via array path bypass in
_.unsetand_.omitCVE-2026-2950 / GHSA-f23m-r3pf-42rh
More information
Details
Impact
Lodash versions 4.17.23 and earlier are vulnerable to prototype pollution in the
_.unsetand_.omitfunctions. The fix for CVE-2025-13465 only guards against string key members, so an attacker can bypass the check by passing array-wrapped path segments. This allows deletion of properties from built-in prototypes such asObject.prototype,Number.prototype, andString.prototype.The issue permits deletion of prototype properties but does not allow overwriting their original behavior.
Patches
This issue is patched in 4.18.0.
Workarounds
None. Upgrade to the patched version.
Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:LReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
lodash vulnerable to Code Injection via
_.templateimports key namesCVE-2026-4800 / GHSA-r5fr-rjxr-66jc
More information
Details
Impact
The fix for CVE-2021-23337 added validation for the
variableoption in_.templatebut did not apply the same validation tooptions.importskey names. Both paths flow into the sameFunction()constructor sink.When an application passes untrusted input as
options.importskey names, an attacker can inject default-parameter expressions that execute arbitrary code at template compilation time.Additionally,
_.templateusesassignInWithto merge imports, which enumerates inherited properties viafor..in. IfObject.prototypehas been polluted by any other vector, the polluted keys are copied into the imports object and passed toFunction().Patches
Users should upgrade to version 4.18.0.
The fix applies two changes:
importsKeysagainst the existingreForbiddenIdentifierCharsregex (same check already used for thevariableoption)assignInWithwithassignWithwhen merging imports, so only own properties are enumeratedWorkarounds
Do not pass untrusted input as key names in
options.imports. Only use developer-controlled, static key names.Severity
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HReferences
This data is provided by the GitHub Advisory Database (CC-BY 4.0).
Release Notes
lodash/lodash (lodash)
v4.18.1Compare Source
v4.18.0Compare Source
v4.17.23Compare Source
Configuration
📅 Schedule: (UTC)
🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.