Skip to content

Conversation

@jfroche
Copy link
Collaborator

@jfroche jfroche commented Jan 27, 2026

Enable auto-review and add custom labeling instructions for CI, extensions, infrastructure, Nix, Docker, AMI, security, tests, docs, and migrations.

Disable verbose summary options and GitHub checks integration.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enabled automated code reviews for pull requests targeting the develop branch with high-level change summaries.
    • Implemented automatic labeling for pull requests by change category (CI, extensions, infrastructure, Nix, Docker/AMI, security, tests, docs, migrations).
    • Streamlined review output (high-level summaries only) and disabled auto-replies and decorative/art outputs.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@jfroche jfroche requested review from a team as code owners January 27, 2026 21:37
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 27, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new .coderabbit.yaml configuration file was added. It enables auto_review (enabled: true, drafts: false) for develop base branch, disables changed_files_summary while enabling high_level_summary, disables poem, review_details, review_status, sequence_diagrams, github-checks, chat art, and auto_reply, and sets knowledge_base.code_guidelines.filePatterns to include CONTRIBUTING.md. It also defines labeling_instructions covering labels: ci, extensions, infrastructure, nix, docker, ami, security, tests, docs, and migrations with corresponding trigger phrases.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description provides key details about what was enabled (auto-review, custom labeling) and disabled (verbose options, GitHub checks), but does not follow the repository's description template which requires selecting between Default or Extension Upgrade templates. Update the description to follow the repository's template format by selecting and completing either the Default or Extension Upgrade template from the template options.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main change: configuring CodeRabbit for automated PR reviews, which directly matches the addition of the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 2-8: The header comment about CodeRabbit auto-review is
inconsistent with the YAML setting; update either the comment or the setting so
they match: change the header lines ("# Disable CodeRabbit auto-review...") to
reflect that auto_review is enabled, or set reviews.auto_review.enabled to false
to match the current comment; specifically modify the top comment block or the
reviews.auto_review.enabled key to keep the file consistent and unambiguous.

Enable auto-review and add custom labeling instructions for CI, extensions, infrastructure, Nix, Docker, AMI, security, tests, docs, and migrations. 

Disable verbose summary options and GitHub checks integration.
@jfroche jfroche force-pushed the coderabbit-settings branch from 32f73f0 to a491c38 Compare January 27, 2026 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants