tests: exercise pull request review

[khoi]

This temporary PR changes the documented draft and fork behavior so SupaReview has a clear issue to report. It tests the live pull request workflow and will not be merged.

Note

This PR is a smoke test only. Its README change is intentionally wrong.

[github-actions]

SupaReview

Findings

The only changed line documents behavior that the unchanged workflow does not provide: draft jobs are explicitly gated off, and fork runs lack the required secret and write-capable token. The patch should be reverted or accompanied by workflow changes that actually implement those claims.

Findings

• [P2] Do not claim that draft pull requests are reviewed
  

  supareview/README.md

  Line 24 in 57c1cc1

  SupaReview reviews draft and fork pull requests. It gives both subagents the same diff context, runs them in parallel, deduplicates their findings, and posts one review comment.

  
  The changed sentence at README.md:24 contradicts the workflow shown immediately above it and the checked-in trigger: jobs.supareview.if is github.event.pull_request.draft == false. Draft pull requests therefore have their review job skipped; only a later ready_for_review event can cause a review. Restore the “skips draft” wording or change the workflow to implement the documented behavior.
• [P1] Do not claim that fork pull requests are reviewed
  

  supareview/README.md

  Line 24 in 57c1cc1

  SupaReview reviews draft and fork pull requests. It gives both subagents the same diff context, runs them in parallel, deduplicates their findings, and posts one review comment.

  
  The changed sentence at README.md:24 also claims fork support without any corresponding workflow or authentication change. For an ordinary fork-triggered pull_request, repository secrets such as CODEX_BALANCER_API_KEY are not available and the token is read-only by default, while this workflow passes that secret to the review action and needs write access to publish a review. The existing workflow consequently cannot reliably run and post reviews for fork PRs; restore the “skips fork” wording or add a deliberately fork-safe implementation.

Review type: Full review

Reviewers: thermo-nuclear-review-subagent, thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review-subagent