Skip to content

feat(blog): add work-email-finding-bench receipt post - #547

Draft
JayZeeDesign wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/work-email-finding-bench-b568
Draft

JayZeeDesign wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
cursor/work-email-finding-bench-b568

Conversation

@JayZeeDesign

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What this does

Adds /blog/work-email-finding-bench, a receipt post comparing work-email finding across vendors (treg, Clay, Monid, Freckle, Deepline) based on a measured 2026-09-16 neutral run.

Key findings from the 292-person bench:

  • Quality tie: treg, Clay, Freckle at 262-264 exact matches (difference is noise)
  • Cost gap: treg $0.0056/correct vs Clay $0.0395/correct (~7x)
  • Latency: treg 0.44s median (per-call) vs Clay 11.2s

Includes:

  • Full data table with all measured numbers (find rates, exact match, precision, cost)
  • Fair Clay framing ("when to choose Clay" section for visual/GTM/spreadsheet workflows)
  • Disclosures: list bias (all had published emails), MillionVerifier re-verify, 3 rows 502 bug
  • Links to /pricing, /people-search, /workflows/find-and-verify-a-lead-list, /use-cases/lead-enrichment-for-ai-agents
  • Blog index card, sitemap entry, route ownership

Source data: 2026-09-16 neutral run. Row-level CSV files stay private.

How it was tested

uv run --frozen python -m pytest tests/test_blog.py -v  # 15 tests pass
uv run --frozen python -m pytest tests/test_seo.py -v   # 69 tests pass (includes sitemap 200 check)
uv run --frozen python -m pytest tests/test_app_roles.py -v  # 7 tests pass (route snapshot)
uv run lint-imports  # 14 contracts kept

New tests in tests/test_blog.py:

  • 200 status, canonical, H1, breadcrumbs
  • Key measured numbers present (90.4%, $0.0056, $0.0395, etc.)
  • Links to related pages
  • Disclosures present (list bias, MillionVerifier, 502 bug)
  • Fair Clay framing present
  • No em-dashes (product constraint)

Checklist

  • uv run --with pytest-xdist pytest -n auto -q passes locally
  • Added or updated tests for the change (if it affects behavior)
  • Updated the relevant docs/context/ fragment (if a subsystem changed) — N/A, blog post only
  • No secrets in the diff (keys, tokens, .env values)
Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Receipt post comparing work-email finding across vendors based on a
2026-09-16 neutral run of 292 people with published team-page emails.

Key findings:
- Quality tie: treg, Clay, Freckle at 262-264 exact matches
- Cost gap: treg $0.0056/correct vs Clay $0.0395/correct (7x)
- Fair Clay framing included for visual/GTM/spreadsheet workflows

Includes:
- /blog/work-email-finding-bench route with full data table
- Disclosures: list bias, MillionVerifier re-verify, 502 bug
- Links to /pricing, /people-search, /workflows, /use-cases
- Blog index registration, sitemap entry, route ownership
- 15 new tests covering content, SEO, and constraints

Co-authored-by: Jason Zhou <JayZeeDesign@users.noreply.github.com>
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Sep 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Folded into #551.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants