docs: clarify Cinderbox as the CM5 path - #20
Merged
Conversation
Replace the old CM5 fallback note in the Matchbox BOM with a direct reference to the dedicated Cinderbox BOM. This makes it clear that the CM5 carrier-board configuration is its own model path, not a Matchbox fallback.
Clarify the role of Matchbox and CM5 carrier-board path.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this changes
bom-QSMCXW.md)Why
The old section implied that a CM5 carrier-board configuration was a Matchbox fallback. That is no longer the right framing. Cinderbox is the dedicated CM5-based model and should be referenced directly.