Skip to content

chore: sync template to v1.6.3, preserving CI efficiency customisations from #22#31

Merged
timdixon82 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/sync-template-v1.6.3-rebased
Jul 13, 2026
Merged

chore: sync template to v1.6.3, preserving CI efficiency customisations from #22#31
timdixon82 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
chore/sync-template-v1.6.3-rebased

Conversation

@timdixon82

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

Intended to supersede pull request #28, which conflicts with main because a separate, already-merged pull request (#22, "chore: CI efficiency improvements") customised the same workflow files the template sync touches.

This branch was built by running the sync script fresh against current main, so it brings in the rest of the v1.6.3 template while preserving all three deliberate customisations from #22:

  • The placeholder Playwright workflow (no real tests) stays removed.
  • The Security workflow keeps its pip caching and the Semgrep 1.166.0 version pin.
  • The CodeQL workflow stays pull-request-only, without the push-to-main trigger.

In practice these three customisations already match the current master template content (they appear to have been backported upstream since #22 merged), so after the sync ran, only the removal of the re-added Playwright workflow needed to be manually reapplied. The other template changes (updated pinned action SHAs, refreshed .github/accessibility-tools/package-lock.json, .claude/template-version bumped to 1.6.3) came through unchanged from the sync.

This should supersede #28 once Sonja and Tim confirm; #28 has been left open with a comment pointing here rather than closed, since closing an existing pull request isn't a pre-approved action for this branch of work.

No test changes were needed since this is a CI/template configuration sync with no application code change.

@timdixon82 timdixon82 merged commit bb74458 into main Jul 13, 2026
8 checks passed
@timdixon82 timdixon82 deleted the chore/sync-template-v1.6.3-rebased branch July 13, 2026 18:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant