Test PR: CodeRabbit Integration Demo

[cyrusagent]

Summary

This is a test PR created to demonstrate and debug CodeRabbit's behavior with PRs created by the Cyrus agent.

Changes

• Added a simple test comment to the README.md file (line 100)

Note

This PR is NOT meant to be merged. It exists solely to test CodeRabbit's integration with agent-created PRs.

Related Linear issue: PF-535

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

A test change is added to README.md, inserting a horizontal rule and a note line stating "This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration." after the "Get in touch" section. No functional code modifications are made.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Update README.md	Adds horizontal rule and test note text to demonstrate CodeRabbit integration after the "Get in touch" section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• The change is purely documentation text insertion with no functional or logic implications

Poem

A test note hops into the README,
A simple line for all to see.
No code to break, just words so neat,
The CodeRabbit hops with rabbit feet! 🐰

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The PR title 'Test PR: CodeRabbit Integration Demo' accurately reflects the main objective of creating a test PR to demonstrate CodeRabbit's behavior with agent-created PRs.
Description check	✅ Passed	The PR description clearly explains the purpose (testing CodeRabbit integration), documents the changes made (test comment added to README.md), and references the related Linear issue PF-535.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	The PR fulfills the objective of PF-535 by creating a dummy PR with a simple non-functional change (test comment in README.md) that is explicitly not meant to be merged, to reproduce CodeRabbit's behavior.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are scoped to the stated objective: adding a test comment to README.md for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration. No unrelated modifications are present.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch cyrus/pf-535-create-a-test-pr-to-demo-a-coderabbit-problem

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[paveldudka]

@CodeRabbit full review

[coderabbitai]

✅ Actions performed

Full review triggered.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Disabled knowledge base sources:

• Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories

You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c00f252 and 8b1e6a1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

README.md

100-100: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

---

100-100: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix markdown emphasis style to use underscore.

Line 100 uses asterisks for emphasis (*text*) but the configured linting rule expects underscores (_text_). This is a minor style inconsistency flagged by markdownlint-cli2 (MD049).

Apply this diff to align with the configured emphasis style:

 ---
-*This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration.*
+_This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration._

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	---
	*This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration.*
	---
	_This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration._

🧰 Tools

🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)

100-100: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

---

100-100: Emphasis style
Expected: underscore; Actual: asterisk

(MD049, emphasis-style)

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

In README.md around lines 98 to 100 the emphasis is written with asterisks
("*This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit integration.*") but the
project's markdown lint expects underscores; change the emphasized text to use
underscores instead (e.g., "_This is a test change for demonstrating CodeRabbit
integration._") so the file conforms to MD049.