Skip to content

docs(plugins): fix tether SKILL.md exit-code contradiction for ask - #801

Merged
jiashuoz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/fix-tether-ask-exit-code
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

docs(plugins): fix tether SKILL.md exit-code contradiction for ask#801
jiashuoz merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/fix-tether-ask-exit-code

Conversation

@jiashuoz

@jiashuoz jiashuoz commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • plugins/e2a/skills/tether/SKILL.md had a self-contradictory claim about tether.sh exit codes: the summary near the top said both update and ask exit 2 when a send is held for review, but the ask-specific section further down (and the actual tether.sh behavior) says ask exits 4 in that case, not 2. Only update's held case is exit 2 (tether.sh:187); ask's held case is exit 4 (tether.sh:290). Terminal-failure exit 5 is correct for both.
  • Docs-only fix, found via a routine documentation audit against current code.

Test plan

  • Verified against plugins/e2a/skills/tether/tether.sh: update's pending_review path exits 2 (line 187), ask's exits 4 (line 290), both terminal-failed paths exit 5 (lines 178, 284).
  • Confirmed the corrected text now matches the file's own later "exit 4 = held for review" statement for ask.

Generated by Claude Code

The summary at line 117 said update/ask both exit 2 when held for
review, contradicting the ask section further down (exit 4) and the
actual tether.sh behavior: update's pending_review case exits 2
(tether.sh:187), ask's exits 4 (tether.sh:290). Terminal failure (5)
is correct for both.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01C4DfxsAgkCUqWg75tyPhWo
@jiashuoz jiashuoz self-assigned this Aug 2, 2026
@jiashuoz
jiashuoz merged commit 97b359e into main Aug 2, 2026
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants