Repository navigation
Conversation
β¦l.URL Co-authored-by: rschumann <360788+rschumann@users.noreply.github.com>
|
π Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a π emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
π¨ Severity: HIGH
π‘ Vulnerability: A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability existed in
cli_executor.go. When constructing the/runendpoint URL for a remote host, the code copied a parsed URL by value and manually cleared specific fields. If an attacker provided an opaque URL, the.String()method would prioritize theOpaquefield over the manually modifiedPath, allowing the request destination to be fully controlled, bypassing constraints.π― Impact: An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to redirect the request to arbitrary internal or external endpoints by injecting an
Opaquefield, potentially exposing sensitive internal systems or aiding in attacks against other services.π§ Fix: Replaced the direct value copy of the
url.URLstruct with an expliciturl.URL{}struct literal assignment. Only the safe and necessary fields (Scheme,Host,User,Path,RawQuery) are explicitly carried over from the parsed URL. TheOpaquefield is ignored, ensuring predictable URL reconstruction and mitigating the SSRF vulnerability.β Verification: Verified that an opaque URL no longer overrides the path using a test script. Executed the full test suite (
go test ./... -short) to ensure no functionality is broken.PR created automatically by Jules for task 8801992598675585028 started by @rschumann