Skip to content

Conversation

@jomatthi
Copy link

This PR renames the 2024 EGamma datasets to be consistent with the 22/23 EGamma datasets.

@riga riga self-requested a review January 26, 2026 17:20
@riga
Copy link
Member

riga commented Jan 26, 2026

The 22/23 campaigns that I just checked all name it "data_e_*". Which ones were you referring to?

@jomatthi
Copy link
Author

jomatthi commented Feb 2, 2026

I'm referring to the run3_2022/3_pre/postEE/BPix_nano_v12 campaigns, so datasets like this in 2022 postEE:

cpn.add_dataset(
    name="data_egamma_e",
    id=14783260,
    is_data=True,
    processes=[procs.data_egamma],
    keys=[
        "/EGamma/Run2022E-22Sep2023-v1/NANOAOD",  # noqa
    ],
    n_files=188,
    n_events=148654795,
    aux={
        "era": "E",
    },
)

I do see however, that in the nano_uhh_v14 campaigns the other convention is used, so there seems to be some kind of inconsistency.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants