The name HarborAsyncClient is technically correct, but is incredibly verbose. As this package is async-first, having Async in the class name seems superfluous. While we can't get rid of this name entirely because of backwards-compatibility, we can introduce a new alias that can be imported instead.
Some suggestions:
HarborHarborAPIHarborClient
- In this case we need to break backwards-compatibility with imports of
harbor.HarborClient, which currently is a shorthand for harbor.client_sync.HarborClient, and then rename the existing one to harbor.client_sync.HarborSyncClient.
The name
HarborAsyncClientis technically correct, but is incredibly verbose. As this package is async-first, havingAsyncin the class name seems superfluous. While we can't get rid of this name entirely because of backwards-compatibility, we can introduce a new alias that can be imported instead.Some suggestions:
HarborHarborAPIHarborClientharbor.HarborClient, which currently is a shorthand forharbor.client_sync.HarborClient, and then rename the existing one toharbor.client_sync.HarborSyncClient.