Repository navigation
feat(core): add bounded guarded approval HTTP client - #12
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Guarded approval callers can now opt into explicit context and approval HTTP operations in
@lingva/core. The client captures intent before credentials resolve, bounds the complete attempt and streamed body, and emits sanitized errors. Every failed approval preserveskeep-commandguidance; only an explicit matching-UUID acknowledgment resolves the captured intent.The helper uses existing codecs, sends one credential-isolated POST and blocks redirects. Existing authoring/delivery APIs and package versions remain unchanged. This is an unpublished additive candidate; server changes, caller adoption and package publication are outside this PR.
Validation:
docs/verification/guarded-approval-http.md.The loopback receipt fixture proves transport behavior only. It does not establish actual server authorization or database atomicity. No package publication or hosted call occurred.