[fireairforce]

ref pr: utooland/utoo#2609

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
site	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 24, 2026 7:40am

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @fireairforce, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request updates the documentation examples for the @utoo/pack Node.js API to align with recent changes in its configuration structure. The build and dev functions now expect their options to be encapsulated within a config object, ensuring the provided code snippets accurately reflect the current API usage.

Highlights

• API Configuration Update: The build and dev functions from @utoo/pack now require their parameters to be nested within a config object.
• Documentation Alignment: Updated the documentation examples for both English and Chinese versions to reflect the new API configuration structure.
• mode parameter removal: The mode parameter (e.g., "production", "development") has been removed from the configuration examples, indicating it might no longer be directly passed or is handled implicitly.

Changelog

• content/en/utoopack/index.mdx
  • Updated the build function call to wrap configuration parameters in a config object.
  • Updated the dev function call to wrap configuration parameters in a config object.
  • Removed the mode parameter from both build and dev function examples.
• content/zh/utoopack/index.mdx
  • Updated the build function call to wrap configuration parameters in a config object.
  • Updated the dev function call to wrap configuration parameters in a config object.
  • Removed the mode parameter from both build and dev function examples.

Activity

• No human activity has been recorded for this pull request.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[fireairforce]

Thanks for the feedback from @chenjiahan

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates the documentation examples for the @utoo/pack build and dev functions, introducing a config object for their parameters. However, the mode property, which is essential for defining the build environment, was inadvertently removed from these examples and not re-included within the new config object. This creates an inconsistency with the config.mdx documentation, which currently shows mode as a top-level property for the programmatic API. The examples should be updated to correctly include the mode property, either within the config object (if the API has changed to fully nest all options) or at the top level, to ensure accurate API usage guidance.