Replace defunct test description links with test sandbox in notebooks#510
Conversation
…where appropriate
|
|
|
Pull requests must include at least one of the required labels: |
validbeck
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good, but I moved some notebooks for PRT around so some gnarly merge conflicts need to be resolved.
…ichers/sc-15539/integrate-beta-test-sandbox-into-quarto-and
PR SummaryThis PR refines the documentation across multiple Jupyter notebooks by replacing embedded markdown links with plain text names for tests. The changes remove URL wrappers from test names (e.g., converting " Test Suggestions
|
Pull Request Description
What and why?
Several notebooks still linked to retired test description pages. Those references are updated to use the beta test sandbox instead, so readers land on the current way to explore and run tests. The behavior for running code in the notebooks is unchanged apart from navigation and documentation links.
How to test
notebooks/and confirm links that previously pointed at defunct test descriptions now point at the test sandbox (or the intended replacement target).What needs special review?
Confirmation that each replacement link matches the surrounding context (comparison tests, raw data, quickstart, tutorials, and use-case notebooks).
Dependencies, breaking changes, and deployment notes
Release notes
documentation— Notebook learning paths now point readers to the interactive ValidMind test sandbox instead of removed test catalog description links.Checklist