Skip to content

chore(deps): update dependency coverage to v7.16.2 - #640

Merged
vil02 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/coverage-7.x
Sep 28, 2026
Merged

vil02 merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
renovate/coverage-7.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
coverage 7.16.1 → 7.16.2 age confidence

Release Notes

coveragepy/coveragepy (coverage)

v7.16.2

Compare Source

  • Fix: on Python 3.14 and later, a for loop completing immediately before a
    function return could mistakenly report an uncovered branch. This is now
    fixed, closing issue 2168_.

  • Fix: on Python 3.14 and later, the else clause of a try whose body is
    a with statement could incorrectly be reported as covered when the
    with raised. This is now fixed, closing issue 2289_.

  • Fix: with dynamic_context = test_function, test methods written as
    @staticmethod or @classmethod were not given a context of their own.
    Now they are, on Python 3.11 and later. Closes issue 1923_.

.. _issue 1923: #​1923
.. _issue 2168: #​2168
.. _issue 2289: #​2289

.. _changes_7-16-1:


Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • At any time (no schedule defined)
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@codacy-production

codacy-production Bot commented Sep 27, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

🟢 Coverage ∅ diff coverage · +0.00% coverage variation

Metric Results
Coverage variation ✅ +0.00% coverage variation (-1.00%)
Diff coverage ✅ ∅ diff coverage

View coverage diff in Codacy

Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (b07d017) 431 431 100.00%
Head commit (6a24b3d) 431 (+0) 431 (+0) 100.00% (+0.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#640) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (b07d017) to head (6a24b3d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #640   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           25        25           
  Lines          431       431           
  Branches        33        33           
=========================================
  Hits           431       431           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@vil02
vil02 merged commit 53013ec into master Sep 28, 2026
21 checks passed
@vil02
vil02 deleted the renovate/coverage-7.x branch September 28, 2026 06:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant