Skip to content

docs: remove infrastructure provider/cost mentions (Rule #7)#17

Merged
keirsalterego merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/scrub-infra-leaks
May 25, 2026
Merged

docs: remove infrastructure provider/cost mentions (Rule #7)#17
keirsalterego merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/scrub-infra-leaks

Conversation

@keirsalterego

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Strips an infrastructure free-tier/cost leak from the public security policy per Rule #7 (no infra cost/provider/free-tier signals in public repos).

Change

SECURITY.md — Known Limitations:

  • Before: Free-tier infrastructure constraints may affect throughput during burst loads.
  • After: Infrastructure capacity constraints may affect throughput during burst loads.

Technical meaning (capacity affects burst throughput) is preserved; the free-tier cost signal is removed.

No source/logic changes. Docs-only.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings May 25, 2026 07:40

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

Removes a public “free-tier” infrastructure signal from the security policy while preserving the underlying operational meaning (capacity constraints can impact burst throughput), aligning with the stated Rule #7 opsec requirement.

Changes:

  • Reworded a Known Limitations bullet to remove cost/provider/free-tier phrasing while keeping the same throughput/capacity implication.

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@keirsalterego keirsalterego merged commit 229f918 into main May 25, 2026
1 check passed
@keirsalterego keirsalterego deleted the docs/scrub-infra-leaks branch May 25, 2026 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants