docs: link experiments archive + add analysis charts#14
Merged
Conversation
- Main README.md and README.zh-TW.md: new "Experiments archive" /
「實驗資料」 section linking to experiments/README.md
- experiments/README.md: replaces the prose-only intro with four
analysis charts:
1. Round structure overview (52 dirs, 26 paired, 11 models)
2. Plan B brownfield 0/3 → 3/3 fix-rate matrix with per-model
remaining-bug counts (real numbers from re-validating the
archive against current rule library)
3. Plan C multi-module task-completion matrix surfacing the
anti-paralysis ROI mechanism (g54mini-mc-a abandoned vs
g54mini-mc-b completed same task)
4. Mermaid flowchart of the three Aegis ROI mechanisms
(rule-hit → fix; structural guardrail; anti-paralysis ritual)
- Plus a "Direct lineage" chart connecting each experiment finding
to the PR that fixed it (Round 8 → PR #9; Round 9 → PR #11/#12).
Also re-imports `experiments/31flashlite-amb-b/` as plain files —
the previous commit accidentally captured it as a gitlink because
codex had created a nested `.git/` inside the round dir during the
agent run. Removed the nested `.git/` and re-added the 6 actual
deliverable files.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
wei9072
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 7, 2026
Three changes following user feedback: 1. **Move the experiments link to the top** of both main READMEs. Previously it sat between Status and License at the bottom — most readers never reached it. Now it appears immediately after the "if you are an AI agent" pointer block, with a 📊 emoji marker. 2. **Add `experiments/README.zh-TW.md`** — full Chinese translation of the experiments analysis dashboard (overview chart, Plan B fix-rate matrix, Plan C task-completion matrix, three ROI mechanisms Mermaid, direct lineage). All four charts and all tables translated. 3. **Add language switcher** (`English · 繁體中文`) to both experiments README files so they resolve to each other. The Chinese main README (README.zh-TW.md) was already updated in PR #14 with an experiments section; this commit just relocates that link to the top and points it at the new zh-TW counterpart. Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a hyperlink to `experiments/` from the main READMEs (EN +
ZH) and turns the experiments archive's own README into an
analysis dashboard with four charts.
Charts added to `experiments/README.md`
task shape (Plan A / B / C / Round 9 / initial)
variant) cell, how many of the 3 planted SEC bugs remain.
Computed from the actual archived files against the current
rule library, so the numbers are reproducible. The headline:
GPT-5.2 / GPT-5.3-codex / GPT-5.4-mini all show 3 → 0 (perfect
fix) when paired with Aegis.
anti-paralysis ROI: GPT-5.4-mini A variant abandoned the task
(no `notifications.py`, no `tests.py`, 24k tokens spent on
design proposals); B variant of the same model completed.
Cycle introductions: 0/14.
table marking which mechanisms were designed-in vs emergent.
Plus a direct lineage ASCII chart connecting each experiment
finding to the PR that fixed it (Round 8 codex → PR #9; Round 9
Go/Java → PR #11 / #12).
Repo housekeeping
The previous `experiments` PR accidentally committed
`31flashlite-amb-b` as a gitlink (submodule pointer) because
codex had created a nested `.git/` inside that round directory
during the agent run. This PR removes the nested `.git/` and
re-imports the 6 actual deliverable files as plain content.
Test plan
(was 1 stale gitlink entry before this PR)
`for d in *-bf-?; do python3 aegis_validate.py "$d/auth.py" | grep -c security; done`
🤖 Generated with Claude Code