Repository navigation
docs: fix ECONOMICS.md's stale pricing source-of-truth - #9
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
docs/ECONOMICS.md's pricing paragraph pointed readers exclusively at the legacyin-process demo path (
council/coordinator.py/council/run_demo.py) as if its fixedWORKER_POOL = 30/JUDGE_FEE = 5constants were the live network's pricing. Per D50 indocs/DECISIONS.md, the live network (council/net/) actually prices every job throughcouncil/net/config.py'spool_for(job_type, n_minds)— a single source of truth thatscales the per-mind price by responder count and each job type's
pool_multweight(e.g.
chat1x,research_report3x,assisted5x), driven by the same-defaultedPW_WORKER_POOL/PW_JUDGE_FEEenv vars.Fix
Rewrote the paragraph to:
STARTER_ALLOWANCE = 100(confirmed asPW_STARTER_CREDITSincouncil/ledger.py)as shared by both paths
pool_for()-scaled pricingGET /job-typeson a live coordinator as the actual current numbersfor any deployment, rather than this doc
Docs-only change — no code touched.
Verification
ruff check .→ All checks passedpytest tests/ -q→ 507 passed, 1 skipped (0 failed) — this box is heavily loaded(many concurrent agent sessions/CI runners sharing
codeagents.slice), so the run took~10 minutes instead of the documented ~5s, but completed clean.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code