Skip to content

docs(qa): record updates-about suite-sweep report - #17

Open
wmfeht wants to merge 1 commit into
docs/qa-suite-sweep-20260911from
cursor/qa-updates-about-eba2
Open

wmfeht wants to merge 1 commit into
docs/qa-suite-sweep-20260911from
cursor/qa-updates-about-eba2

Conversation

@wmfeht

@wmfeht wmfeht commented Sep 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Description

Adds the Settings → Updates / About QA report for the 2026-09-11 suite sweep at 66fb0e6. Scope is strata-qa-updates-about only. Verdict is pass-with-nits: About identity and channel / Check now behavior hold on this InPlace build; GitHub HTML comments from the v0.15.0 release body render as visible text in Current release notes.

No product code changes. No issues filed.

Visual evidence

N/A for a product UI change. Screenshots from the isolated Xvfb session document the QA surfaces:

Settings About identity
Updates Check now up to date
Auto-check on with visible HTML comment in notes
Preview channel selected

How to test

  1. Open working-docs/qa-suite-sweep-20260911/qa/updates-about.md.
  2. Confirm the verdict, coverage table, and finding 1 match the artifact trees under /opt/cursor/artifacts/updates_about_*.

Expected result: Report is the Updates/About slice of the suite sweep; product behavior is unchanged.

Related issue

N/A — documentation-only QA report for the suite sweep. No product issue filed (one nit: visible GitHub HTML comment in release notes).

To show artifacts inline, enable in settings.

Open in Web Open in Cursor 

Add the Settings Updates/About QA report for the 2026-09-11 suite
sweep at 66fb0e6. Verdict is pass-with-nits: About identity and
channel/check-now behavior hold; GitHub HTML comments render as
visible text in current release notes.

Co-authored-by: William Feht <wmfeht@users.noreply.github.com>
@wmfeht
wmfeht marked this pull request as ready for review September 11, 2026 05:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants