Skip to content

docs: add jq to the dev shell example - #41

Merged
robjtede merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
small-improvement-20261102
Nov 2, 2026
Merged

robjtede merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
small-improvement-20261102

Conversation

@robjtede

@robjtede robjtede commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add pkgs.jq to the flake-parts dev shell example because the imported Rust Just recipes require it.

Testing

  • Evaluated the Rust msrv recipe with an isolated PATH: without jq, it failed with exit 127; with jq, it passed and returned 1.70.0.
  • Full flake checks not run; this change updates documentation only.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review in Change Stack →

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review.

Recent review info
Run configuration
  • Source mode: Auto
  • Repository: Unavailable
  • Branch: Unavailable
  • File: No configuration file from this repository applied
  • Commit: Unavailable
  • Layers: Organization UI
  • Review profile: CHILL
  • Plan: Advanced
  • Run ID: 20f0b2c9-c933-4c85-9e12-1dca93518aea
Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5b21b96 and 7b2e0e7.

Files selected for processing: 1
  • README.md

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 1 included review per hour; 0 remain after this review.

Walkthrough

The Flake-parts development-shell example in the README now includes pkgs.jq in its package list.

Merge Risk: Minimal · up to 7b2e0

The development-shell example now includes the dependency required by its Rust recipes and is ready to merge.

Pre-merge checks: Passed 5
Check name Status Explanation
Title check Passed The title clearly and concisely states that the development shell example adds jq.
Description check Passed The description explains why jq was added and reports focused testing for the documented change.
Docstring Coverage Passed No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentat…
Linked Issues check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Full details: Docstring Coverage

Explanation

No eligible functions found in the changed files. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff with cyclomatic complexity of at least 2. Documentation-only edits and deletions within surviving functions are included; unchanged diff context and fully deleted functions are excluded. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files. (1 skipped: 1 unsupported.)

  • Autofix · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@robjtede
robjtede merged commit 25b9a95 into main Nov 2, 2026
3 checks passed
@robjtede
robjtede deleted the small-improvement-20261102 branch November 2, 2026 22:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant