Skip to content

Update jev-mcp (jkudish) entry for the 0.10.0 toolset and shipped skill - #281

Merged
yibie merged 1 commit into
yibie:mainfrom
kittimzhe:update/jev-mcp-entry
Sep 27, 2026
Merged

yibie merged 1 commit into
yibie:mainfrom
kittimzhe:update/jev-mcp-entry

Conversation

@kittimzhe

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What

One-line update to the existing jev-mcp (jkudish) entry in categories/infra-sdks-integrations.md — no new entry, no cross-posting.

Why

The entry still describes the project as a "proof-of-concept MCP server" with three capabilities (claim verification, content screening, candidate ranking). The project shipped 0.10.0 today and the description has drifted from reality:

  • eleven judgment tools (jev_verify, jev_screen, jev_noul, jev_find, jev_rerank, jev_classify, jev_decide, jev_compare, jev_extract, jev_review, jev_gate), all with fail-closed handling (unknown arguments rejected, malformed provider answers surface as invalid_response rather than a clean pass)
  • an agent skill shipped inside the npm package (since 0.9.0), so coding agents get judgment-tool policy — which tool to call when, fail-closed handling, privacy — without hand-written prompts; likely the most list-relevant development
  • opt-in stateless Streamable HTTP transport (0.10.0)

The new sentence keeps one line, names the decision layer (eleven tools, fail-closed), and calls out the shipped skill.

Format compliance

  • Category file only; the README aggregate is regenerated by scripts/build-readme.py
  • Single bullet line, no star badges, no counts
  • The Noul tool name matches the vendor's question-type naming

Disclosure

Prepared with the help of an AI coding agent (per CONTRIBUTING, "Disclose AI generation"). I'm a merged contributor to jev-mcp (#36, shipped in 0.10.0), which is how I noticed the entry had drifted; this PR updates the upstream project's entry, not one of my own.

@yibie
yibie merged commit f12bad9 into yibie:main Sep 27, 2026
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants