Repository navigation
feat(experiments): measure Jev's repeat-run variation - #34
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Every earlier Jev result (#28, #30) came from a response cache that returns one answer per (question, passage) pair, so Jev's run-to-run variation was never measured.
experiments/jev_rerank/repeat.pyscores the same pairs three times (pass 0 from the cache, passes 1 and 2 with the cache bypassed), using the union pool of 10 and wording v1 over the 38 gold and 15 hard questions. Cloud calls only; about $0.04. The bands were committed before the run.Also a README correction (separate commit): the Experiments table said Jev's Hit@1 was 38/38 and 36/38, which I wrote from single cached runs.
Result
Jev is not deterministic.
The bands left a gap for "Hit@1 differs by exactly 1", which is what happened: not Stable, not Unstable. Plain reading: mild run-to-run variation, and the 38/38 should be read as 37 to 38. The direction of the earlier comparisons still holds: bge scores 33/38 on the embedding pool and on the union pool, and Jev has not been seen below 37 on the 38.
Caveats
Changes outside
experiments/README: two table cells reworded to say Jev's results move by about one question between runs, and that 38/38 held in two of three passes.