Repository navigation
docs: explain cold-cache one-shot runs on OpenCode 2 - #51
Merged
Merged
Conversation
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a FAQ entry for #46. On OpenCode 2, a one-shot
opencode runfails withModel unavailable: litellm/…when the provider is declared underproviders.*and the plugin's model cache is cold. The entry explains why: OpenCode registers config providers only after plugin setup returns, and one-shot commands don't wait for discovery (anomalyco/opencode#57421). It also documents the two workarounds:opencode serveCloses #46
Type of change
How was this tested?
git diff --checkis clean.makeProviderSourceinsrc/plugin/v2.ts.Scope
No code changes. The ordering limitation itself is upstream; this PR only documents it.