Clarify case choices and research collaboration across pairs - #54
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Students need concrete starting questions and a clear way to share research across pairs. This focused documentation update expands the case guide to seven optional workflow ideas, each with a bounded question and an evidence route to check. Multiple pairs may study the same workflow through complementary questions or deliberate replication.
The four-document change preserves the broad research scope, optional propagation/starter practice, tentative 75/25 grading, current working dates, and existing Pair case/Individual task workflow. It adds no platform dependency or student submission. External environments and trace sources remain candidates requiring actual access/setup checks.
Relates to #3, #6, #9, and #24; these cohort collections remain open.
Validation and attribution
git diff --checkpassed.007a71b6aade35f7b061b1b899b3bd134117dde9: PR CI run.Maintainer documentation work prepared and checked with Codex assistance; no student work or empirical results are claimed.
Merge review
The owner's September 25 instruction authorizes modest repository improvements. The GitHub API confirms that
zhongnzis the only eligible collaborator/code owner, so this owner-authored PR cannot obtain independent approval. Required checks passed before the merge used the documented owner bootstrap exception in CONTRIBUTING.md and the access guide. Preserve the merge commit and existing protections; this exception does not represent an independent review.