Skip to content

Docs: draft issue asking gpui-mobile where hot reload should live - #71

Merged
Bombatomica64 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hot-reload-discussion
Oct 12, 2026
Merged

Bombatomica64 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hot-reload-discussion

Conversation

@Bombatomica64

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Adds docs/upstream/hot-reload-discussion.md, a draft asking the gpui-mobile maintainers whether hot reload is useful to them and where they'd like it. Nothing is posted. longbridge/gpui-mobile has Discussions off, so it's written as an issue.

The draft covers:

  • what cargo-gpui does, with credit to Dioxus and Subsecond;
  • the measured times: a patch shows 3.3–3.6 s after the save, and a reload with a delta takes 8.3 s;
  • the split: the tool and crates stay standalone, and GpuiLibraryLoader is proposed for gpui-mobile;
  • the question of where they'd like it, and an offer to send the loader as a small PR.

Its image is the phone strip from the A1 spike. A fresh capture of the split version waits for the phone.

It also indexes the draft in docs/upstream/README.md (row 20) and links it from MOBILE_PATCHES and CONTRIBUTING_IDEAS item 4.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Not posted. longbridge/gpui-mobile has Discussions off, so it's an issue
draft: what cargo-gpui is (Subsecond, credit to Dioxus), the measured
times, the split (tool and crates standalone; GpuiLibraryLoader proposed for
gpui-mobile), and the question of where they'd like it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Oct 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-10-12T13:47:15.588437Z be73672 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@Bombatomica64
Bombatomica64 merged commit bd790c8 into main Oct 12, 2026
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant