Skip to content

chore: release v1.8.1 - #536

Open
0xLeif wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
0xleif/chore/release-1-8-1
Open

0xLeif wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
0xleif/chore/release-1-8-1

Conversation

@0xLeif

@0xLeif 0xLeif commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Test Plan

  • fledge lanes run verify (fmt, lint, test, build, spec-check, validate-templates) passes; fledge --version → fledge 1.8.1
  • fledge trust verify --range origin/main..HEAD passes (augur: review, risk 46, from the lockfile and version-file churn)
  • diff against the published fledge-1.8.0.crate's Cargo.lock: only fledge's version line differs
  • Every commit in v1.7.2..origin/main appears in the [v1.8.1] section (26/26)
  • Full CI rollup green (the three test cells, the three Integration cells, trust, spec-check, audit)

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

https://claude.ai/code/session_01V3ZZAEiUP7xRJPozhZb6rL

fledge 1.8.0 was published to crates.io on 2026-09-19 from 435b7c5, a
release-branch head that never reached main. 1.8.1 is that release cut
from main, with #531, #533, #534 and #535 on top.

Bumps Cargo.toml and flake.nix to 1.8.1. Cargo.lock differs from the
published 1.8.0 lockfile only in fledge's own version; no dependency
moves. The bump was done by hand, because `fledge release` runs
`cargo generate-lockfile`, which re-resolves every dependency.

The changelog section covers every commit since v1.7.2, with a note on
1.8.0. The stale "Unreleased" block, which described #520 (shipped
here), is folded into that entry.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01V3ZZAEiUP7xRJPozhZb6rL
@0xLeif
0xLeif requested a review from a team as a code owner September 26, 2026 17:57
@0xLeif
0xLeif requested review from 0xGaspar, Kyntrin, corvid-agent and tofu-ux and removed request for a team September 26, 2026 17:57
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 26, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-09-26T18:00:27.298853Z 4bb984c PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions github-actions Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Corvin says...

      _
    <(^\  .oO(Caw! ^v^)
     |/(\
      \(\\
      " "\\

"Looking sharp! Like a beak should be."

CI Summary

Check Status
Dependency Audit ✅ Passed
Integration (3 OS) ✅ Passed
Lint (fmt + clippy) ✅ Passed
Spec Validation ✅ Passed
Tests (3 OS) ✅ Passed

Powered by corvid-pet

@0xLeif 0xLeif mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2026
5 tasks

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant