SRR and CODS updates

[martin-springer]

• Code changes are covered by tests
• Code changes have been evaluated for compatibility/integration with TrendAnalysis
• New functions added to __init__.py
• API.rst is up to date, along with other sphinx docs pages
• Example notebooks are rerun and differences in results scrutinized
• Updated changelog

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.68%. Comparing base (e4349b1) to head (f64077a).
Report is 25 commits behind head on aggregated_filters_for_trials.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                        Coverage Diff                        @@
##           aggregated_filters_for_trials     #426      +/-   ##
=================================================================
- Coverage                          96.10%   95.68%   -0.42%     
=================================================================
  Files                                 11       11              
  Lines                               2206     2366     +160     
=================================================================
+ Hits                                2120     2264     +144     
- Misses                                86      102      +16     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[martin-springer]

@noromo01 - I tried to help with the soiling.py formatting. Not sure, if I made it better or worse tough... However, all of those can be fixed easily. I can take care of that, if you like? The only one that I need your input is the last exception in soiling.py (./rdtools/soiling.py:2944:5: E722 do not use bare 'except'). What exception would you like to catch there?

[noromo01]

@martin-springer I believe I fixed the formatting issues, everything looks good to me except for that bare except. I talked to Matt about that yesterday, we are working to find a solution to that. Someone else wrote that code so we are having some difficulty figuring out how to fix that

[martin-springer]

@martin-springer I believe I fixed the formatting issues, everything looks good to me except for that bare except. I talked to Matt about that yesterday, we are working to find a solution to that. Someone else wrote that code so we are having some difficulty figuring out how to fix that

@noromo01 - Got it. Thanks for fixing the formatting. It's looking good now. Please add your changes to the changelog under (docs\sphinx\source\changelog\pending.rst).

@mdeceglie - Besides the one bare exception in soiling.py, this PR is ready for your review.

[noromo01]

@martin-springer I believe I fixed the formatting issues, everything looks good to me except for that bare except. I talked to Matt about that yesterday, we are working to find a solution to that. Someone else wrote that code so we are having some difficulty figuring out how to fix that

@noromo01 - Got it. Thanks for fixing the formatting. It's looking good now. Please add your changes to the changelog under (docs\sphinx\source\changelog\pending.rst).

@mdeceglie - Besides the one bare exception in soiling.py, this PR is ready for your review.

@martin-springer @mdeceglie Matt and I are still working out some of the kinks with the notebook testing. We got everything to look good for method='half_norm_clean' but are still trying to make sure we don't change the functionality of Matt's new methods with piecewise and negative shift detection

[mdeceglie]

Closing in favor of #432