Follow current UCNS atomic lexical recursion - #69
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: d65ec5715b
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| -> primary contemporary lexical-semantic corpus | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| The earlier NGSL lexical-floor premise remains **DEPRECATED**. The later Scrabble-dictionary source selection is **SUPERSEDED** for this work. Webster 1913 is deferred and is not part of the current execution graph. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When an agent follows the repository's required entrypoint, this declaration that Scrabble is superseded conflicts with CANON.md lines 34 and 258, which still authorize and require a Scrabble source, and with README.md/CLAUDE.md, which still describe the fixed-floor architecture. Consequently, new lexical work can select incompatible source and construction contracts depending on which mandatory document it follows; update the canonical and agent-facing documents together or leave the new claims unresolved until they agree.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L15-L20
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| "commit": "66db8322b1d4ad68493b2f2fc64c81a4aa987edb", | ||
| "generated_at": "2026-08-17", | ||
| "note": "This report describes the cited EDCM state plus the current repo-owned plan. Report-only and language-boundary documentation commits are coordination metadata; they do not upgrade measurement, empirical, proof, semantic, or canon status. The current UCNS lexical-floor premise is deprecated and replaced by a dictionary-corpus direction with Scrabble dictionary authorized as the source class." | ||
| "commit": "060d3c64e2758f4d4f4fbfd1351294faa8fc3c2b", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
If this commit is applied to its parent as reviewed, 060d3c64... is neither this commit nor an ancestor of it; it is a sibling commit whose report still contains the previous Scrabble plan. A checkout containing the reviewed history therefore cannot use source.commit and source.branch: main to recover the state represented by this report, defeating the report's exact provenance contract. Split the language change before the report update or pin an actual published ancestor containing the claimed source state.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L31-L39
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| { | ||
| "repository": "The-Interdependency/skill-lib", | ||
| "relation": "build, evidence, and cross-repository coordination doctrine", | ||
| "relation": "build/evidence doctrine and current scale-affixiation / atomic-closure procedural boundary; no UCNS geometry authority transfer", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For portfolio consumers that derive repository ownership from this report, this relation assigns skill-lib a scale-affixiation/atomic-closure boundary even though line 143 assigns those construction laws to UCNS and the repository authority map limits skill-lib to organization-wide build/evidence doctrine. This gives one UCNS representation rule two apparent authorities and can make downstream coordination consult or update the wrong repository; keep skill-lib's relation limited to procedural workflow doctrine.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L33-L38
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
|
|
||
| Historical EDCM artifacts keep their exact identities and names. | ||
| - consume exact source-bound UCNS gonol identities and receipts; | ||
| - preserve order, multiplicity, occurrence, part of speech, sense/synset, source, provenance, scale, and atomic identity; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When a future recursive-gonol consumer is implemented from this boundary, the revised preservation list drops context, which the previous contract included and CANON.md line 187 still requires for every new language-semantic experiment. For repeated or polysemous word/sense receipts, retaining sense and source without the occurrence context cannot reconstruct which semantic evidence was measured, so add context back to the required receipt fields.
AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L76-L85
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
What changed
characters -> morphology -> definitions -> recursive gonol relationsBoundary
EDCM measurement remains separate. This PR changes the consumer contract, not empirical validity or UCNS proof status.