Increase val-2f/val-2c reproducibility - #385
Conversation
13317be to
4b7c29c
Compare
fe6789b to
1f52004
Compare
|
Job Documentation, step Sync to remote on d6906cb wanted to post the following: View the site here This comment will be updated on new commits. |
A working case for all three phases of the simulation Probably all four of these are important components - Nondimensionalization with different reference concentrations for all species so that active set numerics are decent for all - nl_rel_tol = 1e-9 with no nl_abs_tol - Reduce growth factor to 1.05 (1.1 was too high ... led to diffs) - Refine the light case twice (once refined was still not refined enough, it led to diffs) Sometimes you need a sufficient amount of accuracy in order for the test to be robust, especially in problems like this where for most of the simulation only like 1/20th of the simulation domain has non-trivial concentrations Refs idaholab#200
|
Job Precheck, step Format Check Clang on e28b7c8 wanted to post the following: Your code requires style changes. A patch was auto generated and copied here
Alternatively, with your repository up to date and in the top level of your repository:
|
simopier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I understand this is still a work in progress @lin-yang-ly, but here are some minor comments.
Co-authored-by: Pierre-Clement Simon <pierreclement.simon@gmail.com>
|
@simopier, this PR is ready for your review. For val-2c and heavy tests of val-2f, we have two versions in gold folder: one using In the corresponding tests, I also include two versions, one use |
simopier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lin-yang-ly, let's have a discussion about the requirements for the tests for (1) stability, (2) making sure the gold files used in the documentation remain up to date.
Also, investigate the possibility of having csv of outputs at regular, specific sync times to avoid some of the issues we've seen with bdf2 across environments and number of cores.
Co-authored-by: Pierre-Clement Simon <pierreclement.simon@gmail.com>
|
@simopier The PR is ready for your review. It currently includes both schemes to ensure each gold file is covered by a corresponding test. In addition, the |
simopier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @lin-yang-ly for finalizing this!
I have very minor comments left. Could you address those and update the moose submodule, as discussed. This will be good to go after that.
Co-authored-by: Pierre-Clement Simon <pierreclement.simon@gmail.com>
@simopier Thank you for these comments! I have updated the MOOSE submodule already, currently, the MOOSE version is "76a12d39d8", which is the latest MOOSE version in master branch. |
|
Job Build test summary, step Build test summary on d6906cb wanted to post the following: Test summaryCompared against c94cbdd in job civet.inl.gov/job/3717731. Removed tests
Added tests
|
simopier
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thank you @lindsayad, @loganharbour, and @lin-yang-ly!
A follow up PR will re-organize the tests/verification/validation/examples to help select the tests to run on MOOSE's CI, and which ones to run only on TMAP8's.
|
Thanks for finishing up the work @lin-yang-ly ! |
|
Doesn't this close #200? |
You are absolutely right! Thank you for catching this! I just closed it. |
Increase val-2f/val-2c reproducibility


This has failed thus far as CI will show
EDIT:
(Ref. #380)
(Ref. #382)