Skip to content

fix(lockscreen): refresh greeter state on re-entry - #921

Closed
zccrs wants to merge 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
zccrs:pr913-lockscreen-refresh
Closed

zccrs wants to merge 1 commit into
linuxdeepin:masterfrom
zccrs:pr913-lockscreen-refresh

Conversation

@zccrs

@zccrs zccrs commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This splits the non-VT lock screen / greeter refresh changes out of #913.

  • refresh the lock screen when Treeland re-enters an already locked state
  • keep the greeter QML state deterministic on repeated activation
  • avoid mixing UI refresh logic into the VT switching adaptation PR

This is intentionally separated from the VT switching path so #913 stays focused on wlroots/libseat VT adaptation.

Refresh the lock screen and greeter UI when Treeland re-enters an already locked state.\n\n在Treeland重新进入已锁定状态时刷新锁屏与greeter界面。\n\nKeep the visual state deterministic across repeated greeter activations without mixing it into the VT switching path.\n\n让重复的greeter激活保持确定的视觉状态,并与VT切换路径解耦。\n\nLog: 刷新锁屏重入状态\n\nInfluence: 锁屏界面在重复激活时会主动刷新显示状态,避免重入后界面残留。

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry @zccrs, you have reached your weekly rate limit of 500000 diff characters.

Please try again later or upgrade to continue using Sourcery

@deepin-ci-robot

Copy link
Copy Markdown

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zccrs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@zccrs

zccrs commented Jun 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

做vt重构时引入的一个提交,但是没啥用,直接关闭了

@zccrs zccrs closed this Jun 2, 2026
@zccrs
zccrs deleted the pr913-lockscreen-refresh branch June 12, 2026 01:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants