Skip to content

🔒 Fix MITM vulnerability by enforcing strict TLS verification - #8

Open
maattyi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/strict-tls-verification-15229617384818167353
Open

🔒 Fix MITM vulnerability by enforcing strict TLS verification#8
maattyi wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/strict-tls-verification-15229617384818167353

Conversation

@maattyi

@maattyi maattyi commented May 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

🎯 What: The vulnerability fixed was the ability to bypass SSL certificate validation and hostname checking by setting verify_ssl=False in the configuration.
⚠️ Risk: When verify_ssl=False was set, the application would disable hostname checking (check_hostname = False) and set the verification mode to ssl.CERT_NONE. This completely bypasses TLS security checks, leaving the proxy and its downstream connections open to Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks. Any attacker on the network could present a fraudulent certificate, intercepting, modifying, or reading the sensitive data meant for the actual servers.
🛡️ Solution: The verify_ssl configuration option and all its related parameters have been completely removed across all related components (DomainFronter, H2Transport, ProxyServer). The application now exclusively relies on ssl.create_default_context() without any insecure overrides, which strictly enforces certificate validation (ssl.CERT_REQUIRED) and robust hostname verification, effectively closing the MITM vulnerability.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 15229617384818167353 started by @maattyi

Removes the `verify_ssl` configuration option and explicitly sets secure
defaults using `ssl.create_default_context()`. This prevents the proxy
from being vulnerable to Man-In-The-Middle (MITM) attacks by explicitly
disabling insecure overrides such as `ssl.CERT_NONE` and `check_hostname = False`.

Modifications extend across `domain_fronter`, `h2_transport`, and `proxy_server`.

Co-authored-by: maattyi <228237318+maattyi@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant