Skip to content

chore: bump version to 0.1.4 - #9

Merged
maoyeedy merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/bump-0.1.4
Oct 16, 2026
Merged

maoyeedy merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
chore/bump-0.1.4

Conversation

@maoyeedy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Summary

  • Bump to 0.1.4 (csproj Version/AssemblyVersion/FileVersion, manifest Identity Version).
  • Ships the dead-reference fix from fix: dead-reference projects no longer blank the list; flag missing projects #3 (stale Unity Hub entries no longer blank the list; missing projects are flagged), the ProjectParser hardening, and Windows App SDK 2.2.0.
  • Fix a release-build blocker: win-arm64.pubxml still set PublishReadyToRun=True while win-x64.pubxml dropped it in 38d0ce5. Restore then skips the arm64 ReadyToRun runtime pack and the bundle build fails with NETSDK1094 (the tag build in CI would hit the same). Removing it makes the profiles match.

Verification

  • Clean dotnet restore + CI-style dotnet build --no-restore ... -p:AppxPackageSigningEnabled=false produces UnityExtension_0.1.4.0_x64_arm64.msixbundle with 0 errors (before the fix: NETSDK1094 / ILLink crash).
  • Manual smoke test of the extension in Command Palette passed (author).
  • Not done: sideloading this exact signed bundle (needs an elevated trust step), and the real CI tag build.

After merge

Tag v0.1.4 from master; the store-publish job waits for approval in the microsoft-store environment.

Release 0.1.4 carries the dead-reference fix from #3 (projects with stale
Unity Hub entries no longer blank the list; missing projects are flagged),
the ProjectParser hardening, and Windows App SDK 2.2.0.

Drop PublishReadyToRun from win-arm64.pubxml so it matches win-x64. With it
set only on arm64, restore does not fetch the arm64 ReadyToRun runtime pack
and the bundle build fails with NETSDK1094 (this would also fail the tag
build in CI).
@maoyeedy
maoyeedy merged commit 2b42c11 into master Oct 16, 2026
2 checks passed
@maoyeedy
maoyeedy deleted the chore/bump-0.1.4 branch October 16, 2026 02:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant