feat: create tests#1096
Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Your solution is approved. All four tests correctly validate the splitInteger function behavior, and the tests pass. There's one naming issue in test 4 where the description says 'should add zeros if value < numberOfParts' but the test actually uses splitInteger(32, 6) where 32 > 6 and expects [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6] with no zeros. This is a documentation mismatch rather than a functional issue—the test still validates a valid scenario (splitting a value across more parts). Consider updating the description to something like 'should distribute value across many parts' to accurately reflect what the test does. This is a minor issue and doesn't block completion of the task.
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
|
|
||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => {}); | ||
| test('should add zeros if value < numberOfParts', () => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The test description says 'should add zeros if value < numberOfParts' but this test uses splitInteger(32, 6) where value (32) is NOT less than numberOfParts (6). The expected output [5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6] doesn't contain zeros. The description needs to be corrected to match what this test actually validates, or the test case should be changed to test the 'value < numberOfParts' scenario.
2 participants
No description provided.