Skip to content

docs(rfc): propose unified artifact search - #1858

Merged
Teingi merged 1 commit into
oceanbase:masterfrom
frf12:codex/artifact-search-rfc
Oct 9, 2026
Merged

Teingi merged 1 commit into
oceanbase:masterfrom
frf12:codex/artifact-search-rfc

Conversation

@frf12

@frf12 frf12 commented Oct 7, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Which issue or RFC does this PR close?

Introduces RFC #1858 for unified Artifact search. Related: #1549 and #1803; database migrations follow #1771. Atomic Memory integration depends on #1809, without blocking other Families.

Rationale for this change

Callers need query-relevant top-N Artifacts rather than unordered entries truncated by a context budget. A common search contract reduces duplicated endpoint and retrieval implementations while preserving Family-specific behavior.

What changes are included in this PR?

This PR contains only the English and Chinese 1858-artifact-search.md RFCs, with no runtime code changes.

Are there any user-facing changes?

Documentation only. This PR proposes a future API and does not change runtime behavior, the OpenAPI contract, or persisted data. Existing specialized endpoints remain available under the proposal.

How was this change tested?

  • Read-only bilingual review against the RFC template and agreed scope.
  • Checked local Markdown links and matching template headings.
  • git diff --cached --check.
  • Commit-time repository hooks passed, including ty check.
  • Runtime tests and documentation build were not run; this PR changes documentation only.

AI usage statement

Created and reviewed with OpenAI Codex (GPT-6) under maintainer direction.

@frf12
frf12 force-pushed the codex/artifact-search-rfc branch from 8455811 to 897a356 Compare October 7, 2026 07:03
@frf12
frf12 force-pushed the codex/artifact-search-rfc branch from 897a356 to cd85280 Compare October 7, 2026 07:09
@Teingi
Teingi merged commit d3ef2c1 into oceanbase:master Oct 9, 2026
25 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant