fix(test): restore main typecheck — pass resolveLaunchArgs in the record store slot test

[Jinwoo-H]

	Files	Added	Deleted	Net
Test	1	$\color{#1a7f37}{\Huge{\mathbf{+}}}$​2	$\color{#cf222e}{\Huge{\mathbf{−}}}$​1	$\color{#1a7f37}{\Huge{\mathbf{+}}}$​1
Prod	0	0	0	0

ELI5

Main does not typecheck. Two PRs merged close together: #25721 made resolveLaunchArgs a required runtime dependency, and #24934 added a test that builds the runtime without it. Each was green alone; together they break pnpm tc, which fails every PR's "static analysis and typecheck" job.

What Changed

Test-only: the new test in src/main/runtime/agent-session-record-store-slot.test.ts now passes resolveLaunchArgs: () => [], matching every other test that builds these deps.

Why

Smallest change that restores a green main; no product code changes.

Linked Issue

N/A — main-breakage fix from the #25721 + #24934 merge interaction.

Visual Proof

N/A — test-only typecheck fix.

Testing

• pnpm tc passes (failed on main before with TS2741).

• vitest run src/main/runtime/agent-session-record-store-slot.test.ts: 5/5 pass.

• I manually tested these changes locally

• Automated tests added/updated, or explained why not below

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

• Configuration used: Repository UI
• Review profile: CHILL
• Plan: Advanced
• Run ID: c39b85fc-bbe2-46ef-9fed-4c425e18459e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 28ed544 and 51db392.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/main/runtime/agent-session-record-store-slot.test.ts

Included review availability: This review used your included allowance. Your plan provides up to 10 included reviews per hour; 6 remain after this review.

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The chat-host setup test now supplies an empty launch-argument list through resolveLaunchArgs. The existing empty environment resolver remains unchanged.

Priority: ⬇️ Low

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to 51db3

The change supplies the required resolver for a store-and-teardown test; the inspected path does not launch sessions or omit saved arguments, so no actionable merge risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly identifies the test change and its purpose: restoring the main typecheck by passing resolveLaunchArgs.
Description check	✅ Passed	The description explains the problem, the test-only change, and the rationale. It also states why visual proof is not applicable and reports typecheck and test results. The linked issue is marked N/A,…
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 1…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

📝 Generate docstrings

• Commit to this branch
• Create a new PR

• Autopilot · Keep fixing CodeRabbit findings and required CI, and resolving merge conflicts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}