pm: assess HTTP MCP governance gap, file #783 (discussion tools)#784
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Review passed. Journal-only PR — clean PM session entry. Good analysis: the governance loop gap (reconcile_page landed without discussion tools, so external agents can act but can't perceive) is a sharp observation and well-prioritized. Pipeline state is accurate, deferred items are explained, and the note about the TS type errors being too small to file separately shows good judgment. No protected files touched, build green. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
PM session journal update.
Changes
Verification