Independent reanalysis of GSE78220 (Hugo et al., Cell 2016) characterizing transcriptional differences between anti-PD1 responders and non-responders in metastatic melanoma.
Anti-PD1 therapy produces durable responses in only 30-40% of metastatic melanoma patients. Hugo et al. identified a transcriptional resistance program - IPRES (Innate anti-PD1 RESistance) - present in pre-treatment tumor biopsies of non-responding patients, involving upregulation of mesenchymal transition, ECM remodeling, angiogenesis, and wound healing gene sets. This pipeline independently reanalyzes the raw sequencing data using a modern computational workflow to reproduce and extend those findings.
- Accession: GSE78220
- Publication: Hugo et al., 2016, Cell 165(1):35–44
- Platform: Illumina HiSeq 2000, paired-end 2×100bp
- Samples selected: 21 unstranded samples (10 responders, 11 non-responders)
- Exclusions: 7 stranded samples excluded to avoid library preparation batch effects
Response classification:
- Responder: Complete Response or Partial Response
- Non-responder: Progressive Disease or Stable Disease
Stage 0 Environment and project structure setup
Stage 1 Data acquisition and metadata validation (GEO)
Stage 2 Raw QC - FastQC + MultiQC
Stage 3 Adapter trimming - fastp (paired-end)
Stage 4 Post-trim QC - FastQC + MultiQC
Stage 5 Genome indexing - STAR (GRCh38, Gencode v45)
Stage 6 Alignment - STAR 2-pass mode
Stage 7 Quantification - featureCounts (unstranded)
Stage 8 Differential expression - DESeq2
Stage 9 Downstream - GSEA, clusterProfiler, figures
Why unstranded samples only: The GSE78220 dataset contains a mix of stranded and unstranded libraries across samples. Including both would introduce a systematic technical batch effect that cannot be cleanly corrected at this sample size without sacrificing statistical power in DESeq2. The 21 unstranded samples provide a balanced 10v11 comparison with no batch correction required.
Why STAR 2-pass: 2-pass alignment uses novel splice junctions discovered in the first pass to improve alignment accuracy in the second pass. This is the current standard for publication-quality RNA-seq analysis.
Why featureCounts over Salmon: The original Hugo et al. analysis used alignment-based quantification (TopHat2/Cufflinks). This pipeline uses a modern alignment-based approach (STAR/featureCounts) to remain comparable to the original while using significantly improved tools. Strandedness is set to unstranded (parameter 0) to match library preparation.
Reference genome: GRCh38 primary assembly with Gencode v45 annotation, representing a methodological improvement over the hg19/UCSC annotation used in the original paper.
Melanoma_RNAseq/
├── config/
│ ├── config.sh # All paths and parameters
│ ├── samples.tsv # Sample metadata and SRR accessions
│ └── GSE78220_family.soft # Raw GEO metadata
├── data/
│ ├── raw/ # Downloaded FASTQs (not tracked)
│ ├── trimmed/ # fastp output (not tracked)
│ └── counts/ # featureCounts matrix
├── genome/ # Reference files (not tracked)
├── qc/
│ ├── raw/ # FastQC + MultiQC on raw reads
│ ├── trimmed/ # FastQC + MultiQC post-trimming
│ └── alignment/ # samtools flagstat per sample
├── results/
│ ├── deseq2/ # DEG tables, normalized counts
│ └── figures/ # All publication-quality plots
├── scripts/ # Numbered pipeline scripts
├── envs/ # Conda environment specifications
└── logs/ # SLURM job logs (not tracked)
- Bridges-2 HPC (PSC) or equivalent Linux cluster with SLURM
- Conda
Upstream (Stages 2–7): Uses the bioinfo conda environment.
conda env create -f envs/rnaseq_upstream.ymlDownstream (Stages 8–9): Uses the rnaseq_r conda environment.
conda create -n rnaseq_r -c conda-forge r-base -y
conda activate rnaseq_r
R < scripts/install_r_packages.REach stage is a self-contained SLURM script. Submit sequentially:
sbatch scripts/01_download.sh
sbatch scripts/02_fastqc_raw.sh
sbatch scripts/03_trim_fastp.sh
sbatch scripts/04_fastqc_trimmed.sh
sbatch scripts/05_star_index.sh
sbatch scripts/06_star_align.sh
sbatch scripts/07_featurecounts.sh
# Stages 8-9 run in R after activating rnaseq_r(To be updated on pipeline completion)
- Differentially expressed genes between responders and non-responders
- Recovery of published IPRES resistance signature via GSEA
- Immune cell composition differences via deconvolution
- PCA showing separation of responder and non-responder clusters
Hugo W, Zaretsky JM, Sun L, et al. Genomic and Transcriptomic Features of Response to Anti-PD-1 Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Cell. 2016;165(1):35-44. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.065
Zahin Peerzade
M.S. Quantitative Biology and Bioinformatics, Carnegie Mellon University
github.com/zahinp7 | zahinp7@gmail.com